Latest baseball scores, trades, talk, ideas, opinions, and standings

Archive for the ‘bailouts of banks’ Category

>Are Jewish Bankers Behind New World Order and Deaths of Lincoln, Kennedy, and Other Patriots

>

 Henry Makow Ph.D.  | February 12, 2005
bushsharon

Let’s begin by defining the “New World Order.”

The mainspring of the New World Order is the desire on the part of the world’s central bankers to translate their vast economic power into permanent global institutions of political and social control.

Their power is based on their monopoly over credit. They use the government’s credit to print money, and require the taxpayer to fork over billions in interest to them.

Central banks like the Federal Reserve pretend to be government institutions. They are not. They are privately owned by perhaps 300 families. It is significant that the majority of these families are Jewish, how significant I am not yet sure. If they were Lutherans or Zulus, certainly our objections would be the same.

I am a non-observant Jew who believes this situation is lethal for humanity and Jews alike. We have already seen the tragic consequences of it in World War II.

The American inventor Thomas Edison described this colossal scam, which the New World Order is designed to perpetuate, as follows:

“It is absurd to say our country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the people.”

Central banks also control the supply of credit to businesses and individuals. Robert Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta describes this untenable situation.

“This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is… It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.” “

When the Federal Reserve was inaugurated in 1913, a London banker acknowledged that it is a scam.

“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class… The great body of the people, mentally incapable of comprehending, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical (contrary) to their interests.”
 

CONSEQUENCES

Obviously printing money should be in the public sphere as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution. This anomalous situation is thesource of humanity’s woes. It pits the people who control the economy against society as a whole. It is in their interest to destabilize society, foster immorality, internal division (like gay marriage) and war in order to increase debt and distract and control the masses.

The bankers are responsible for social engineering programs such as the (homo) sexual revolution, feminism and multiculturalism, which undermine family and social cohesion. This fundamental antagonism also supports a vast criminal underworld actually run by the elites.

The bankers are responsible for the assassinations of presidents like Lincoln and JFK, and for the attack on the World Trade Center. They own or control the mass media, which legitimizes George W. Bush, the war in Iraq and the impending attack on Iran. War provides an excuse to introduce the draft and a repressive police state.

Success today is based on a person’s willingness to become an accomplice, witting or unwitting, to the banker fraud. Even rich entrepreneurs are dependent on credit and are unwilling to support genuine change.

As a result of the bankers’ scam, Western society and culture are based on a fraud. We do not have genuine democracy or equal access to the mass media or open and truthful education. Western society is a fraud, run by cowards who know they’re frauds.


ARE “THE JEWS” RESPONSIBLE?

The New World Order is a hydra-headed monster. The bankers work through many fronts such as Communism, socialism, liberalism, feminism, Zionism, neo conservatism and Freemasonry. Unknown to most members, these “progressive” movements are all secretly devoted to “world revolution” which is a euphemism for banker hegemony. (See my “Rothschild Conducts Red Symphony”)

The bankers control the world’s major corporations, media, intelligence agencies, think tanks, foundations and universities. They are responsible for suppressing the truth. Jews figure prominently in all of this, a cause of anti Semitism. Of course many other people are pursuing “success” as well.

The bankers also work through countries. They are largely responsible for British and American imperialism, whose aim is to monopolize the world’s wealth. In his book “The Jews” (1922) British social critic Hilaire Belloc writes that the British Empire represented a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.

“After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical.”

The confluence of Jewish and British interest extended to marriage.

“Marriages began to take place, wholesale, between what had once been the aristocratic territorial families of this country and the Jewish commercial fortunes. After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood was the exception.

In nearly all of them was the strain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the traditions those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish…”

If the marriage of Al Gore’s daughter with Jacob Schiff’s grandson is any indication, this mingling of Jewish and Gentile elites extends to America as well. John Forbes Kerry is another example.

Belloc continues to say that the British and Jewish goal of world domination was synonymous and used Freemasonry as an instrument.

“Specifically Jewish institutions, such as Freemasonry (which the Jews had inaugurated as a sort of bridge between themselves and their hosts in the seventeenth century) were particularly strong in Britain, and there arose a political tradition, active, and ultimately to prove of great importance, whereby the British state was tacitly accepted by foreign governments as the official protector of the Jews in other countries.

It was Britain which was expected to intervene [wherever Jewish persecution took place and] to support the Jewish financial energies throughout the world, and to receive in return the benefit of that connection.”

If Belloc is right, you could say the New World Order is an extension of the British Empire, in which elite British, American and Jewish interests are indistinguishable. See also my “The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism.”


CONCLUSION: WHAT IS JEWISH?

The majority of Jews would want no part of the New World Order a.k.a. “globalization” if they understood its undemocratic character and how they are being used.

The true Jewish spirit holds that truth and morality are absolute and cannot be trimmed to fit one’s perceived self interest. G.J. Nueberger expresses this spirit in his essay “The Great Gulf Between Zionism and Judaism.”

“The Jewish people are chosen not for domination over others, not for conquest or warfare, but to serve G-d and thus to serve mankind…Thus physical violence is not a tradition or a value of the Jews. The task for which the Jewish people were chosen is not to set an example of military superiority or technical achievements, but to seek perfection in moral behaviour and spiritual purity.

Of all the crimes of political Zionism, the worst and most basic, and which explains all its other misdeeds, is that from its beginning Zionism has sought to separate the Jewish people from their G-d, to render the divine covenant null and void, and to substitute a “modern” statehood and fraudulent sovereignty for the lofty ideals of the Jewish people.”

The bankers obviously aren’t concerned about true Judaism or racial purity and were quite willing to sacrifice millions of Jews to achieve their design by backing Hitler. They are sacrificing thousands more Jewish, American and Muslim lives in the Middle East in their Orwellian “perpetual war for perpetual peace.”

Does the New World Order serve a “Jewish” agenda or a banker elite agenda?

I would venture that it serves the latter, and the Jewish people are an instrument of this agenda like so many other people.By giving private individuals the ability to create money out of nothing, we have created a monster which threatens to devour the planet and with it the human race.



Advertisements

>G-20 Guilty of Global Financial Hypocrisy

>Oh, the hypocrisy of Geithner and G-20 leaders. On one hand they pat themselves on the back for over-bailing out big banks while at the sane tune promising fiscal restraint in the future and balanced budgets. BUDGETS? OBAMA IS OPERATING WITHOUT A BUDGET. HOW LONG ARE WE GOING TO ALLOW HIM TO EMASCULATE AMERICA THIS WAY. HOW LONG BEFORE WE GET DISGUSTED AND KICK THE BUM OUT – ALL THE WAY BACK TO KENJA WHERE HE CAME FROM?.

I don’t believe the world’s financial wizards are capable of running the world. They can’t even run their own countries’ monetary systems, let alone the world’s. The reason the world is in this mess in the first place is the over-stimulus of nations’ banking systems. When Americans heard Barak Obama say he needed to stimulate the U.S. economy, they had visions of job creation. Well, in the end the truth comes out. Job creation had nothing to do with his plan to dump trillions into the banks private coffers, at taxpayer expense.

Here’s an example of the kind of job creation Obama is capable of: In May, 2010 ninety-five percent of all new jobs created in America were government jobs. Now, sixty percent of our GDP comes from government paychecks and only forty percent from private enterprise. This is not sustainable. When will we learn? Or is Obama trying to take down our country intentionally? Of course he is. His idea of a good world is leveling the economic playing field. Take from the rich (real job creators) and give to the poor (unions and those who never create new private enterprise jobs, but whose salaries are almost twice that for private enterprise jobs of comparable difficulty). Where can we run? America was the last bastion of the capitalistic system. There’s no place to run. Then we must fight back – take back the government and chase Obama and his ilk off the continent. Maybe Mexico where drug lords rule would take him, Australia where socialism is rampant, Haiti, Cuba, or Puerto Rico.

Other nations took Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner’s lead and followed suit. Now it is widely known that had we let Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and J.P. Morgan go under we would not have prolonged the problem or hurt our country one wit. It would have righted itself as did the recession of the 1920s. Democrats like to make an economic mountain out of a molehill. Wasn’t it that damnable Rahm Emanuel who said “you never want to let a crisis go to waste? Sure he did. And he’s the brains of this Chicago criminal, Barak Obama.

Other people with money would have stepped forward, even without government money, and would have created a reformed banking system. Now we have these fake bankers that we always look to and save to ruin our system. My motto: Let them fail. Congress, The Fed, Geithner and the president didn’t bail out my barber or my favorite restaurants. They failed and more efficient ones take their place.

It’s sickening to hear that G-20 now says they have seen the light and that we need to stem the tide of huge deficits, bailouts and lack of financial transparency. Wellcome to the party, even if you’re eighteen months late.

The problem is this: G-20 article is superficial and at odds with the truth; and don’t believe what you will read in the following report about them. They are liars of the first class. Because of a liar president, they don’t need to tell the truth. They know they will always be insulated from Congressional investigations and voter grilling. Vote Obama and his progressives out of office in November. Let’s right this badly leaking rickety ship of state. Don White, publisher
________________________________________________________________________________

G-20 finance chiefs agree on need to curb deficits

BUSAN, South Korea – World financial leaders pledged Saturday to push ahead on curbing deficits and crafting financial reforms to safeguard the global recovery, including making banks bear much of the burden for government bailouts.
As expected, the finance ministers and central banks gathered in this southern port city finessed what some said were at times heated differences over how to reshape financial regulation and build safety nets for countries stricken by debt crises.
The Group of 20 welcomed measures taken by the European Union, the European Central Bank and the IMF, including a $1 trillion bailout, to help countries cope with the fallout from unsustainably high debt.
“All of us have a strong interest in seeing those programs succeed in restoring confidence,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told reporters after the meetings ended.
Long-term, sustainable growth will depend on rebalancing growth, he said.
“The United States is moving aggressively to fix things we got wrong and to strengthen our economic fundamentals,” Geithner said, noting that as Americans boost savings and investment and consume less, other countries will need to generate more growth.
“All the countries recognize the basic reality that the U.S. is reforming and adjusting and that for the world to grow at its potential it is going to require that growth outside the U.S. will come more from domestic demand than in the past,” he said.
Europe’s sovereign debt crisis — and Hungary’s warning this week that it risks a Greek-style meltdown of its own — sharpened worries that the global economy could succumb to another downturn following the one sparked by the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers in 2008.
The precarious levels of indebtedness among many countries also has driven home the need to restore what in G-20 speak is called “fiscal sustainability,” participants said.
“There is a significant change of tone in the language that the G-20 use on the issue of fiscal sustainability and there is a very explicit reference in the communique to those countries with serious fiscal challenges needing to accelerate the pace of consolidation,” said British Chancellor George Osborne.
While the euro fell below $1.20 for the first time in more than four years Friday in reaction to Hungary’s woes, European officials insisted the problem was being overstated.
“Hungary has made serious progress in consolidating its public finances over the last couple of years,” Olli Rehn, Europe’s commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, told reporters. Any talk of a risk of default “is widely exaggerated,” he said.
Despite qualms over the long-term prospects for European currency unity, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet defended the euro, calling it a “solid currency, a credible currency, a currency that has kept its value in terms of price stability.”
The talks in Busan prepared the agenda for a meeting of G-20 leaders, including President Barack Obama, in Canada later this month.
In the wake of the global recession, the G-20, which includes both advanced and emerging economies, has taken over from the Group of Seven industrialized nations as a key priorities-setting group for the global economy.
The finance ministers are working on reforms of financial regulations to help prevent the kinds of financial meltdowns that contributed to the recession, the worst global slump since World War II.
While there seems to be strong consensus on the broad strokes of what needs to be done, the difficulty is in technical details for reforming financial regulations, including how banks and other financial institutions might bear the burden for government bailouts and other interventions.
The communique issued Saturday did not include any reference to a proposed universal tax on banks to help pay for bailouts, instead saying there was a “range of policy options” to help protect taxpayers.
“It was apparent that most G-20 members do not support the concept of a universal levy,” said Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, whose government opposes it on the grounds its banks had not needed government intervention during the recent crises.
Geithner said the group was ready to move ahead on stronger capital reserve requirements for banks and limits on indebtedness to help banks and other financial institutions weather future crises.
“We will expedite development of new rules while setting a transition period,” he said. “Reducing uncertainty about the ultimate shape of these new rules will help minimize financial headwinds for recovery.”
The group discussed China’s currency, but only in the context of the need — acknowledged by Beijing — to help rebalance its economy toward greater reliance on domestic demand.
The U.S. has urged China to move faster in loosening controls that keep the yuan tethered to the U.S. dollar, and thus undervalued, aiding its exporters in overseas markets.
___