When Did The Devil Get Hold Of Those Nasty Democrats
By Don White
Since Bill Clinton, we have never had a bigger liar in the White House. Parsing words has become a science to those donkey politicians. An Austrian writer, Michael Barnett, has written in The Libertarian Standard “Parsing Political Language: Is Obama An Inveterate Liar?”
Eat your heart out, Derrida.
Libertarians will tell you that Obama made a firm pledge not to raise taxes on any family making less
thank $250,000. Thanks to the Libertarian Standard for the video above. “Parsing Political Language: Is
Obama An Inveterate Liar?”
Barnett claims he’s an Austrian School economist, anarchist, libertarian, father, expatriate living in Sicily,
and director of Global Exports S.R.L, which is another term for saying he makes a little money importing
fine linen from China, jewelry from India, and commodities from all over the world. Beware, true to his
charlatan instincts, he exonerates both Clinton and Obama in typical anarchist language.
Something really bothers me. Republicans and Democrats compete for office on different levels, uneven playing fields. Most Republicans—this is not true with all GOPs—most often tell the truth in their speeches, press releases, and other utterances. Most are square shooters. Barak Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barny “Fife” Frank (the marijuana grower from Boston) and all the other rabble-rouser politicians on the
dark side of D.C. can’t tell a lie from a Bible scripture.
Somewhere, somehow the devil got hold of those nasty Democrats. They have taken a cue and a clue from Barak Obama, the greatest liar-prevaricator of them all in posturing, creating a sham, and failing to tell the truth. He always has the next BIG LIE in mind before saying or doing anything. I’m sure privately he jokes about his success with cronies at being the invisible man. “No man knows my history; I’m here today, gone tomorrow; say one thing and mean another; Master Mayhem, child of the devil. Figure me out if you can. No one has succeeded yet. No one will.”
The big lie for Barak Obama and other libs is whatever they want it to be. Take Obama. A while back he was praising Mitt Romney and his Massachusetts health care. He said Romney was the most competent man in the country on health care. We all know he didn’t mean it. But what did he mean?
Obama’s intent and what he said do not jive. He always has an ulterior motive. He wanted to point out to the country Romney’s biggest negative. But how could health care be a negative for Mitt and not for Barak? Why would he do this? Notice, he praises another person on his soft spots, just to point out to conservatives that maybe Romney isn’t the man that should win your primary. Secretly, he’s saying to himself that Romney would be a heck-of-a presidential candidate and I don’t want to oppose him in November 2012. Another interpretation could be that Obama wants to take off the debate table his own horrendous Obamacare. If that is true, then Mitt wouldn’t be the best candidate. Maybe we need a Chris Christie or a Donald Trump who may have less political baggage.
Barak Obama is devious. You have to read him right. Make no quick judgments. He’s what I call “a walking PR twister.” In Book of Mormon and ancient Biblical times, God said the wicked “wrested” the scriptures. That means they changed scriptural meaning. It’s a wicked and perverse generation who lie and cheat and have no respect for their fellow man.
Where did Obama get his traditions and customs? Not from his father. He didn’t live with him long enough. From his communist mother, Ann Dunham? From Frank Marshall Davis, a big-time communist leader in Hawaii who used to visit Dunham when they lived there? From Mr. Satoro, his step-dad in Indonesia? Hard to say. Maybe he’s a composite of all of those people.
The Forgotten Man – Painting by Jon McNaughton
Past Presidents (including more recent Republican ones) try to raise the plight of the common American, while recent Presidents (Democrat ones) applaud Obama’s brand of ‘transformative change’.
The wretched condition of the ordinary American under Obama as depicted above? True:
In religious families, traditions are taught by fathers and mothers to young children early on
In an article, “Traditions of Their Fathers” by James Duke he said, “Traditions or norms are handed down from generation to generation and are taught to children by their parents, their teachers, their companions, and others with whom they come in contact. Every society places great emphasis on the importance of teaching children the rules of conduct and the standards of behavior of that society.”
Social scientists report that the traditions of a society are “the major means by which (a) order is achieved and (b) an organized way of life is passed down from one generation to the next. The way of life of every society tends to be consistent from generation to generation—even if rapid social change is taking place—because traditions tend to resist change. If traditions do change, they usually change slowly.”
How have Democrat politics degenerated so drastically the past two hundred years?
It’s the increase in lies. Here are some of Barak Obama’s lies:
1) The United States is a Muslim nation.
2) Collective bargaining is a right of every worker.
3) I will close down Gitmo.
4) I will end the wars and bring the boys home. He has already started another war.
5) That he wasn’t listening for 20 years when he sat in Rev. Jeramiah Wright’s Trinity Church and heard him say “God Dam America.”
6) On Wednesday he will propose a value added tax for everyone. He pledged in the campaign not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.
7) He promised in a spending deal with Congress two months ago that he would not increase taxes on the “rich.”
8) That the troops mean a lot to him….and on and on. In all honesty he doesn’t give a crap about the troops. If they did, he would keep his other promise about ending the wars.
I could go on all day. His every utterance is a lie that he doesn’t intend to keep. He grew up knowing that people lie to each other every day. When he sent in that application for a scholarship at Harvard it said he was a foreign student. That was the basis on which the scholarship was granted. If he was a foreigner then, how and when did he become an American citizen? He won’t say, he won’t produce a valid birth certificate. At every turn of this one is a lie. Which one is it, Barak?
Since Bill Clinton, we have never had a bigger liar in the White House. Parsing words has become a science to those donkey politicians. An Austrian writer, Michael Barnett, has written in The Libertarian Standard “Parsing Political Language: Is Obama An Inveterate Liar?” Barnett claims he’s an Austrian School economist, anarchist, libertarian, father, expatriate living in Sicily, and director of Global Exports S.R.L, which is another term for saying he makes a little money importing fine linen from China, jewelry from India, and commodities from all over the world. Beware, true to his charlatan instincts, he exonerates both Clinton and Obama in typical anarchist language.
Watch his every statement Wednesdayafternoon as he speaks at George Washington University about his new plan to cut the deficit. He was forced into doing this because Congressman Paul Ryan has already embarrassed him with his group’s proposal to cut the deficit by five trillion dollars in ten years. If Obama says something, think what he really means. Nine times out of ten, he will say just the opposite to what he really intends to do or what he means. He is that corrupt—someone whom we call an inveterate or habitual liar. “The devil made me lie and I can’t help himself” should be his response if someone asked him about his shoddy record of failing to tell the truth.
Breaking News: I heard some of Obama’s speech today. Rush Limbaugh, who heard all of it, says he lambasted Representative Ryan’s deficit-cutting plan for 45 minutes and for five minutes talked about a possible Democrat plan. But he didn’t present a Democrat plan. He wasn’t prepared to propose anything specific except make suggestions of more of the same old Democrat large government sing-song. He will not be able to raise taxes as he wants–that is if Republicans in Congress stand united against such tax increases. This should be about spending reductions, not more taxes.Click to read Barnett’s article http://www.libertarianstandard.com/2010/04/22/parsing-political-language-is-obama-an-inveterate-liar/