Latest baseball scores, trades, talk, ideas, opinions, and standings

Archive for the ‘Tony Rezko’ Category

>Obama’s Lies Revealed

>In cooperation with Human Events, this blog is printing links to stories you will want to read before voting in November.

Obama: Let’s expose the lies

Dear Conservative Friend,

They say the truth hurts. In Barack Obama‘s case, it is simply devastating.

Not surprisingly the Big Media have kept the American public blind to the truth about Obama, including…

  • This is not old news. It is dated yesterday, Sunday September 28, 2008 and comes from a reliable source, the Chicago Sun Times.

” The implications of Rezko’s cooperation are innumerable. Rezko’s lawyers could not be reached for comment Friday.

“But a source with knowledge of the investigation into the governor and into his wife, Patti Blagojevich’s real estate dealings, say the probe is going “at top speed.”

Remember, it was Obama who bought a lot adjacent to Rezeko’s for several hundred thousand dollars less than Rezeko, himself, paid. Or did Rezeko finance Obama’s lot, too? This is the kind of information the attorney general is trying to pry out of Rezeko and it could affect the presidential candidate Barak Obama, though he lamely claims Rezeko is no longer his friend. Course not…

Advertisements

>Obama’s Lies Uncovered!

>
In cooperation with Human Events, this blog is printing links to stories you will want to read before voting in November.

Obama: Let’s expose the lies

Dear Conservative Friend,

They say the truth hurts. In Barack Obama‘s case, it is simply devastating.

Not surprisingly the Big Media have kept the American public blind to the truth about Obama, including…

” The implications of Rezko’s cooperation are innumerable. Rezko’s lawyers could not be reached for comment Friday.

“But a source with knowledge of the investigation into the governor and into his wife, Patti Blagojevich’s real estate dealings, say the probe is going “at top speed.”

Remember, it was Obama who bought a lot adjacent to Rezeko’s for several hundred thousand dollars less than Rezeko, himself, paid. Or did Rezeko finance Obama’s lot, too? This is the kind of information the attorney general is trying to pry out of Rezeko and it could affect the presidential candidate Barak Obama, though he lamely claims Rezeko is no longer his friend. Course not…

>Word On Middle East Streets American Liberals Can Be Bought.

>

Defense of God’s goodness and omnipotence in view of the existence of evil is called theodicey. Somewhere in the history of America, politicians have lost that desire to defend that which is most sacred, their religious views concerning marriage, family, and the sacred nature of God.



Joseph Smith gave us the best description we have ever had about what God looks like because God appeared with The Son to him in the sacred Palmyra, New York grove in 1820. “If you have seen the me, you have seen the Father,” the Savior said. Why don’t many Americans take that for what it literally means?

It is America’s challenge to defend righteousness and decry evil at every turn. Evil seems to getting the upper hand over what is basic, what is good, and those tenants of truth the founding fathers left us with. Of course, what today’s liberals are trying to do is re-write the U.S. Constitution.

But it can’t be re-written, as Justice Scalia so eloquently said: It is a dead document as opposed to those left-wing liberals who say it is a ‘living document’ which should and can be reconfigured, changed, reduced, and re-interpreted by men many different ways. The liberals would like us to believe that nothing is worthy of keeping, even our Constitution which, along with the Bill of Rights, guarantees rights and privileges of free men living in a free country. They’re selling our freedom down the river.

Scalia says he believes the Constitution’s meaning cannot change over time. It was meant, he says, to impose rigid rules that cannot be altered, except by the difficult process of constitutional amendment.

“If you somehow adopt a philosophy that the Constitution itself is not static, but rather, it morphs from age to age to say whatever it ought to say — which is probably whatever the people would want it to say — you’ve eliminated the whole purpose of a constitution. And that’s essentially what the ‘living constitution’ leaves you with,” Scalia says.

Although he takes an “originalist” view of the Constitution, that its meaning today is the same as when it was drafted, Scalia says this doesn’t mean he wants to undo past Supreme Court decisions with which he disagrees.

“You can’t reinvent the wheel. You’ve got to accept the vast majority of prior decisions. … I do not argue that all of the mistakes made in the name of the so-called living constitution be ripped out. I just say, ‘Let’s cut it out. Go back to the good, old dead Constitution,” Scalia says.

This attitude puts him in a decidedly different camp than fellow conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, who Scalia concedes is far more willing to reverse past precedent.

“I am a textualist. I am an originalist. I am not a nut,” he says, underscoring that he generally doesn’t favor undoing old rulings. He also notes that the idea of a living constitution places no restraints on judges.

Scalia has surprised some critics with his hard-line view on what he sees as the excesses of the Bush administration in at least one area — the imprisonment without charge of U.S. citizens accused of being enemy combatants.

“As with anybody arrested, you bring them to trial or you let them go,” Scalia says.

Notice that he said “U.S. citizens accused of being enemy combatants.” That is much different from imprisonment of foreigner combatants, who should be subject to Martial Law meded out by the military. This is part of the great debate taking place in America today by liberals and conservatives. Liberals love foreigners. In fact, in some cases they prefer them and legally defer to them over citizens of the U.S. To each his own,

I suppose. But when you see a liberal doing this, look for the money. There’s always a money trail, and conservatives are on the nasty scent of Barack Obama in his apparently easy desire to take money from the likes of Tony Rezko—and trade future governmental favors for campaign cash donations from foreign countries like Pakistan that would prefer a softy president like him over a tough-minded president like John McCain . In other words, the word on Middle East streets is the American liberals can be bought.

Where have the liberals in America gone wrong? They have lost their religion—not all of them, but as a whole. They no longer prescribe to the good old-fashioned ideas of families, honor, patriotism, and love of country that conservatives have. I will write more about this, becoming far more explicit in the next blog.

>Corruption Becomes You

>


Obma’s friend Bill Ayres proudly steps on U.S. flag

In the previous post, we posited that convicted felon Tony Rezko may have corrupted Barack Obama.

Judicial Watch reports that the Rezko connection is not the only one that Senator Obama has with major contributors to his political campaigns.

Two months after he took his Senate seat in 2005, the Senator purchased $50,000 worth of stock in highly speculative ventures, whose major investors were some of his biggest campaign contributors. Can you see where this is going? Apparently, Barack is a little slow because he allowed himself to get into this moral bind.

Wasn’t he listening when Reverend Wright spoke each Sunday for almost 20 years? Surely, he must have said something about living a Christ-like life, something more than the anti-American garbage that spewed out of his mouth like hot water and steam of the Yellowstone geyser Old Faithful.

Barack, one of the Sunday School hymnals has a song entitled, “There’s a Right And Wrong To Every Question.” It would behoove you to start singing that song in your home instead of a song of your own making, “Shades of Gray Sooth My Soul, Clementine.”

One of the speculative ventures was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation that Senator Obama pushed just two weeks after purchasing $5,000 worth of its stock. When he was working to pass that legislation, just whose interest was the Senator advancing–his constituents’, the company’s, or his own?

FACTS ABOUT OBAMA’S CONNECTION TO TERRORISTS
Senator Obama has a dirty little secret. It’s his connection to a known terrorist professor living in Chicago. I was outraged when I saw on TV a few months ago that they had to let this terrorist go because of a legal mistake–the police forgot to read him his rights properly. I’m sitting there watching in total amazement. This professor, William Ayers, said over national TV that, yes, I like to blow things up, and the only sad thing is that I didn’t do it more often. And we let this thug get away!

Ayers is a founding member of the terrorist group Weather Underground. Do you recall this group engaged in domestic terrorism in the 1970s and again 1980s? It was infamous. He set off bombs in the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. His group claimed “credit” for a total of 25 bombings.

Ayres and his fellow Weatherman girlfriend (now his wife) turned themselves in to Federal authorities in 1981, but most charges against them were dropped due to alleged prosecutorial misconduct. Ayers was quoted in the New York Times as saying ‘I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.”

Ayres is now a professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago. A few years back, Ayers served with Barack Obama on the board of the non-profit Woods Foundation, which reportedly voted grants totaling $75,000 in 2001 and 2002 to the Arab-American Action Network, a radical organization with terrorist ties.

Ayres and his terrorist wife hosted an intimate political affair for Obama. “It appears that Ayers terrorist past didn’t cause the Senator any more qualms or anxiety than did the racist and vicious anti-American statements made from the pulpit by his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright,” said Fitton.

The above Ayers case and the Rezko scandal are just two of the matters Judicial Watch is looking into. Back in the recesses of Obama’s mind could there be more damning relations and incidents that could take down this man’s entire campaign?